Ramu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83881 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2025 Thana- MAIGRA District- Gaya ====================================================== Ramu Kumar S/o- Denu Yadav R/v- Chauriytad, Panchayat-Chakarbandha Po- Pipra P.S. Dumariya, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 18-12-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Maigra P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025 for the offence under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution story, the Police upon secret information, intercepted a vehicle and there is recovery/seizure of 20 liters of country-made liquor. The petitioner owns the motorcycle and as such, the FIR.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only because of his ownership, he has been implicated, it was actually handed over to a co-villager and he has no criminal antecedent.
5. Further, learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the judgment of the Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2)
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83881 of 2025(2) dt.18-12-2025 2/3 PLJR 1089 wherein it has been held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76(2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.
6. Learned APP opposes the prayer.
7. Taking into account the submissions of the parties and the judgment in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) as also that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail with conditions.
8. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge - III - cum-- Special Excise Judge, Excise Act, Gaya in connection with Maigra P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025 subject to the following conditions: (i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83881 of 2025(2) dt.18-12-2025 3/3 dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every month for six months to mark his attendance and after the end of the period, the certificate shall be submitted before the Trial Court failing which steps shall be taken for the cancellation of the bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U T