Golu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89016 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2025 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== Golu Kumar Son of Late Anil Singh, R/o Village/Mohalla - Aadarsh Colony, Patel Nagar, Nawada, P.S - Nawada, Dist - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-01-2026 Heard the parties.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 115 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 331(4) and 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The main submissions advanced by petitioner's counsel are that the petitioner was remanded in the present matter from Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 113 of 2025 on the basis of his confessional statement, which has no evidentiary value and it has been alleged that from the petitioner's house, battery, TV, paint, wire, etc. were recovered though in the FIR the informant alleged that from his house, battery, inverter, stabilizer, two gas cylinders, TV, silver ornaments, etc. were stolen but the police did not take any step to establish the connection in between the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89016 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 household articles which have been recovered from the house of the petitioner and the articles shown in the FIR, so, there is no evidentiary value in respect of the household articles which are said to have been recovered from the petitioner's house. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has suffered a lot as he has been languishing in jail since 18.03.2025.

4. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of the petitioner but fairly accepts that the police did not take any step for identification of the household articles recovered from the petitioner's house and the articles shown as being stolen from the informant's house.

5. Considering the above submissions, averments made in this application and mainly the aforesaid defence of the petitioner, coupled with his custody period, this Court is inclined to release him on bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner namedabove be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 115 of 2025.

(Shailendra Singh, J) annu/- U T