Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84382/2025disposed

Md. Bablu Khan @ Md. Sadik v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-20Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84382 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1395 Year-2023 Thana- SAHARSA COMPLAINT CASE District- Saharsa ====================================================== Md. Bablu Khan @ Md. Sadik Son of Late Ismail Khan Resident of Village -Kharka Telwa PS- Nauhatta, Dist- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

Tamana Khanam Daughter of Late Salauddin Khan Resident of VillageMadars Tola, Ps- Nauhatta, Dist- Saharsa ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md Harun Quareshi, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP.

For O.P. No.2 :

Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the O.P. No.2.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Saharsa Complaint Case No. 1395C/2023 for the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation is of subjecting the O.P. No.2 to various sorts of torture and cruelty for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the O.P. No.2 and the allegation levelled against him is false and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84382 of 2025(4) dt.20-04-2026 2/3 concocted. The petitioner in Paragraph No. 11 of the bail application has specifically stated that he is ready to keep his wife with full dignity and honour. The petitioner has clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the O.P. No.2 and learned APP for the State jointly opposed the prayer for bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail provisionally on such terms and conditions as the learned District Court deems it fit and proper, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C / 482(2) BNSS.

7. This Court finds that the matrimonial dispute is not an offense against the society rather a matrimonial dispute is a private conflict between spouses and does not inherently constitute an offence against society, as has been held by the Apex Court in the case of Rajendra Bhagat v. State of Jharkhand, reported in (2022) 18 SCC 465. Learned District Court is directed to examine the matter for settlement of the dispute outside the court by way of mediation in light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in case of Rajendra Bhagat

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84382 of 2025(4) dt.20-04-2026 3/3 (supra) and take necessary steps to issue notices to the respective parties and upon their appearance refer the matter before the learned Mediator of the District Mediation Centre by fixing a date for appearance of the parties to give effect to "Mediation for the Nation 2.0".

8. The bail application stands disposed of.

9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Member Secretary, Bihar State Legal Services Authority and the Patna High Court Mediation Centre for the purpose of record. (Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T