← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./82822/2025bail rejected

Manoj Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-02Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82822 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2023 Thana- ANDHRATHARHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Manoj Rai S/o- Jagdish Rai Residents of village- Palar PS-Andhrathadhi District-Madhubani 2.

Arti Devi W/o- Manoj Rai Residents of village- Palar PS-Andhrathadhi District-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for offences under Sections 341, 342, 323, 307, 302, 504, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant alleged that on 17.10.2023, an altercation took place between children while she was cooking. In the meanwhile, the accusedpetitioners allegedly abused and assaulted her with fists and slaps, and later she was also assaulted by Khanti. As a result, she sustained injuries and later, during the course of treatment, she died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82822 of 2025(2) dt.02-12-2025 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioners are in custody since 11.07.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the bail petition and submitted that the informant, Anita Devi, was badly assaulted by the petitioners and other co-accused persons, and subsequently, after giving her statement, she died.

6. Considering the nature and gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, and the same is accordingly rejected.

7. However, since the petitioners are in custody since 21.04.2025, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Neha/- U T