Prince Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82951 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-573 Year-2025 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== Prince Kumar S/o Munna Prasad @ Manidra Prasad R/o Kachchi Dargah, Maharani Astha, Alampur, P.S.- Nadi, Dist.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nityanand Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Purushotam Kumar, Mr. Sonu Kr. Yadav, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Fatuha P. S. Case No. 573 of 2025 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 140(3), 140(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per F.I.R., informant received information about her son from the mobile number of this petitioner and thereafter, his dead body was found.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he has been made accused in this case only on suspicion. Petitioner claims clean antecedent and is in custody since 29.07.2025.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82951 of 2025(2) dt.02-12-2025 2/2
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application. During investigation, the girl with whom deceased had love affair stated that this petitioner was with her and later on, her mama and others killed the deceased.
6. Considering the fact that mobile number of this petitioner was used in the alleged offence, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
7. However, since petitioner is in custody since 29.07.2025, Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial, preferably, within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T