Anil Kumar Karak, v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4882 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5422 of 2019 ====================================================== Anil Kumar Karak, aged about 55 years, male, S/o Late Badri Narayan Karak, R/o Village/Mohalla - Bidyapati Nagar, Balbhadrapur, Ward No. 48, Police Station - Bahadurpur, Laheriyasarai, District - Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Dr. S. Sidharth, the Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2.
Dr. S. Sidharth, the Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna.
3.
Sri Rahul Singh, the Secretary (Expenditure), Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna. 4.
Sri Kameshwar Ojha, Incharge of the Additional Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna. 5.
Sri Kameshwar Ojha, the Joint Secretary, Finance Department Government of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna.
6.
Sri Kameshwar Ojha, Incharge of the Assistant Controller (Budget), Finance Department Government of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna. 7.
Sri Prampusp, the Treasury Officer, Secretariate Treasury, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna.
8.
Sri Binay Kumar, the Treasury Officer, Secretariate Treasury, Vikash Bhawan, Patna.
9.
Sri Satya Narayan Paswan, the District Treasury Officer, Madhubani, Police Station and District - Madhubani.
10.
Sri Nilkamal, the District Treasury Officer, Darbhanga Police Station and District - Darbhanga.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
Patna High Court MJC No.4882 of 2019(3) dt.21-06-2024 2/2 For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Prasad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Anuradha Singh (SC-21) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-06-2024 The show-cause reply reflects that the order passed by this Court on 09.04.2019 in C.W.J.C. No. 5422 of 2019 has been complied with.
2. The petitioner, if unhappy with the order, may challenge the same before an appropriate authority.
3. However, no case is made out for initiating any contempt proceeding against the opposite parties.
4. The petition is dismissed.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Praveen-II/- U