Sanjeev Kumar @ Deepu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76816 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA PS District- East Champaran ====================================================== SANJEEV KUMAR @ DEEPU Son of Late Sudhir Kumar Resident of Mohalla- Gannipur, P.S.- Kaji Mohammadpur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Kumari Shreya Daughter of Rajkumar Singh Resident of VillageKolhuarwa, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Motihari Town, District- East Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha, APP Mr. Mrinal Mohan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-12-2021 Heard Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Mrinal Mohan for the opposite party no. 2. The State is represented by Ms. Pushpa Sinha, learned APP for the State.

The petitioner, who is the husband of opposite party no. 2, seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 51 of 2019 which has been instituted for the offences under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 307, 406, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The matter was referred to the mediation centre for the resolution of the matrimonial dispute

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76816 of 2019(5) dt.21-12-2021 2/3 between the spouses and the families but because of the Pandemic closure, the mediation process could not commence.

A request has been made by the mediator to extend the time for such mediation.

However, this Court under the circumstances deems it appropriate that the records of this case be recalled from the mediation centre and the case be referred to the court below for an effective mediation between the parties under the aegis and supervision of the court.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is ready for settlement of all disputes which can be mutually agreed upon after negotiations. The learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 is also desirous that such negotiations take place and the issues are resolved.

Considering this stand of the parties, it is directed that in case the petitioner surrenders before the court below within a period of six weeks he shall be released on provisional bail subject to the satisfaction of the court below. Simultaneously, the opposite party no. 2 shall be noticed. On her appearance, ample opportunity shall be provided to the parties for negotiating the terms of settlement. Any settlement has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76816 of 2019(5) dt.21-12-2021 3/3 to be mutually acceptable terms. If the parties agree and decide to resolve the issue, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed or else the law will take its own course.

The petition stands disposed off accordingly. (Ashutosh Kumar, J) krishna/- U T