← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2612/2024bail granted

Chandan Kumar Ray @ Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-31Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2612 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2022 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Samastipur ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Ray @ Chandan Kumar S/O Harendra Ray R/O Village -Mirjapur P.S.-Tajpur, Dist- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 31-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case No.173 of 2022, lodged on 11.06.2022, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against two persons including the present petitioner. As per FIR, the total recovery of 227.250 liters of liquor has been made from the hut and open field of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that the said recovery was made from a hut and in the open field near a tree. Counsel submits that the said recovery

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2612 of 2024(2) dt.31-01-2024 2/3 has been made not from the possession of the petitioner and petitioner is innocent. Counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody since 10.11.2023. He is accused in one more criminal case, in which he is on bail.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that antecedent of the petitioner is not clean and earlier he was accused in excise case itself.

6. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner, above named, be granted bail after framing of the charge, if not framed, and upon ascertaining that in other criminal case, i.e., Tajpur P.S. Case No.442/2022, he is not absconding on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise-II, Samastipur, in connection with Excise P.S. Case No.173 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with other following conditions:

(i) One of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his bona fide;

(ii) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2612 of 2024(2) dt.31-01-2024 3/3 before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds by the Trial Court itself;

(iii) The petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidence, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds; and (iv) The petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U T