Md. Chunnu Shah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85402 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKAND District- Gaya ====================================================== Md. Chunnu Shah Son of Md. Manjoor Shah @ Manjoor Miya Resident of Village- Shodipur, P.S.- Chakand, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satyaveer Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-03-2026 Heard Mr. Satyaveer Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 31.05.2025 in connection with Chakand P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 18.02.2025 for the offences punishable under Section 87 of the BNS, 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, this petitioner has abducted the daughter-in-law of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. In fact, the petitioner is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85402 of 2025(3) dt.25-03-2026 2/3 brother-in-law of the victim and the victim's statement has been recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, 2023 in which she has not stated about the petitioner. Apart from that she has also refused for her medical examination. The petitioner is in custody since 31.05.2025.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that the petitioner has clean antecedent, victim has not stated anything about the petitioner and victim has also refused for her medical examination, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateV, Gaya in connection with Chakand P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85402 of 2025(3) dt.25-03-2026 3/3 witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T