Patna High CourtCR. MISC./79503/2019disposed

Lali Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-18Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79503 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-452 Year-2019 Thana- BIHARSHARIF District- Nalanda ====================================================== LALI YADAV Son of Late Mithlesh Yadav Resident of Village- Khairabad, P.S.- Bihar, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumari Sujata Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 25(1-B)A, 26 of the Arms Act.

Allegation is recovery of one loaded pistol and four live cartridges from the possession of petitioner. Considering the nature of allegation against petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

However, after six months of custody the petitioner would be enlarged on bail by the court below itself on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below, in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79503 of 2019(2) dt.18-12-2019 2/2 connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 452 of 2019 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T