← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85002/2025bail granted

Sintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-05Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85002 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-865 Year-2024 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== Sintu Kumar S/o Shravan Kumar R/o Village - Surangpur, P.S - Fatuha, District - Patna At present R/o Village - Shisha Mill, Fatwah, P.S - Fatwah, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.P.N. Shahi, Sr. Advocate Mr.Sonu Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-05-2026 Heard the parties.

2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection Fatuha P.S. Case No. 865 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 27 of Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, deceased is alleged to have been killed by the accused persons.

4. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 30.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23938 of 2025, without examining the case diary and in this attempt, the case diary was called for and from the statement of Amit Kumar, it appears that Abhishek @ Tiger is the assailant of the deceased and no participation of the petitioner has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85002 of 2025(3) dt.05-05-2026 2/2 alleged.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is in custody since 02.12.2024 and has one criminal antecedent. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.

6. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have jointly opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application for regular bail is allowed.

8. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-III, Patna City, Patna /concerned Court below in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 865 of 2024. (Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T