← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./87743/2024bail rejected

Vevek Kumar @ Vivek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-08Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87743 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2024 Thana- CHEWARA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Vevek Kumar @ Vivek Kumar Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav @ Makeshwar Yadav R/o - Ekram, P.S - Chewara, District - Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ram Murti, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-01-2025 Heard Ld. counsel for the petitioner and Ld. APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehend his arrest in connection with Chewara P.S. Case No. 76 of 2024 dated 09.10.2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the allegation, one country made katta loaded with live cartridge has been recovered from the house of the petitioner and no document has been produced by the petitioner in regard to the pistol and the cartridges.

4. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87743 of 2024(2) dt.08-01-2025 2/2 clean antecedent and there is no independent witness to the recovery.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the petition that petitioner has never moved before this Hon'ble Court for grant of Anticipatory bail or Regular bail.

6. It is also stated in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

7. However, Ld. APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail.

8. Considering the recovery of unlicensed pistol and cartridges, I am not persuaded to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

9. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected.

(Jitendra Kumar, J.) ravishankar/- U T