Chhote Lal Rai @ Raj Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82374 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2025 Thana- NEORA District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Chhote Lal Rai @ Raj Kumar Ray S/O Late Ram Chandra Bhagat R/O Vill.- Neori, P.S.- Neora, Dist.- Patna, Bihar 2.

Kunal Rai @ Kunal Raj S/O Shri Chhote Lal Rai @ Raj Kumar Ray R/O Vill.- Neori, P.S.- Neora, Dist.- Patna, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Kant Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-12-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State, Sri Madan Kumar.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 109(1), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 23-7-2025 at 2 PM, a dispute arose between her and her mother-in-law, when her cousin father-in-law, Chhote Lal and cousin elder brother-in-law came and assaulted by an iron rod causing injury on head.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82374 of 2025(2) dt.09-12-2025 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that informant herself alleges that she was having dispute with her mother-in-law and since petitioners are related and reside closeby, as such they came to pacify the issue when they came to be implicated. It is also submitted that petitioners are not criminals.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Neora P.S. Case No. 129 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T