Kameshwar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84921 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRAHI District- Sheohar ====================================================== Kameshwar Ram Son of Ganesh Ram Village -Nayagao Shahbajpur PSShyampur Bhatha District -Sheohar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dinesh Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case No. 172 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant's bike was stolen by unknown miscreants.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the course of investigation, police had information that three persons had gathered to sell a stolen bike, and two bikes were recovered from them. One of the bikes is the stolen bike. He also submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84921 of 2025(2) dt.15-12-2025 2/2 nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner; rather, the recovery was made from the joint possession of three persons. It has also been submitted that the petitioner is just a passer-by. Police asked him to become a witness, which he denied, and police framed him in this case. He further submits that while making the seizure, police have not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS. Moreover, petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.09.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case No. 172 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T