Bablu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25649 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.
Bablu Kumar Son of Dwarika Prasad, Resident of House No. 49, Nawab Manzil, Gurudwara Gali, Frazer Road, Patna, P.O. G.P.O, P.S. Kotwali, District- Patna, Presently working as Librarian , Janta Senior Secondary(2) School, Panapur Dharampur, Block- Bidupur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. 2.
Ruby Kumari, D/o of Dwarika Prasad, Resident of House No. 49, Nawab Manzil, Gurudwara Gali, Frazer Road, Patna, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District- Patna, Presently Working as Librarian, S.M.S. Inter School, Dighi Hajipur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Director, Secondary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The District Education officer, Vaishali at Hajipur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
5.
The District Programme Officer(Establishment), Vaishali at Hajipur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
6.
The Principal, Janta Senior Secondary(2) School, Panapur, Dharampur, Block- Bidupur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. 7.
The Principal Secretary, S.M.S. Inter School, Dighi Hajipur, DistrictVaishali at Hajipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.S.B.K. Manglam, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Mukund Mohan Jha (Gp27) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 20-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is covered by the decision of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 4129 of 2016.
Patna High Court CWJC No.25649 of 2019(2) dt.20-12-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to verify the record to ascertain whether the case of the petitioners is covered by the decision aforesaid.
In the event, this case is covered by the aforesaid decision in C.W.J.C. No. 4129 of 2016, similar treatment should be given to the petitioners of this case also. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U