Dayanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83898 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2025 Thana- BUXAR INDUSTRIAL District- Buxar ====================================================== Dayanand Yadav Son of Ramashankar Yadav Resident of Village- Belaur, P.S.- Buxar Industrial in the District of Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the BNS and under Sections 25(1-b)a, 25(1-aa), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the informant received a secret input that at the house of Dinesh Yadav situated at Dalsagar village, Dinesh Yadav and his associates have gathered who are in possession of illegal arms and are planning a crime. In follow up action, a raid was conducted at the house of Dinesh Yadav, where five persons were present who tried to flee away throwing a plastic bag in verandah, though Dinesh Yadav succeeded in fleeing away from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83898 of 2025(2) dt.11-12-2025 2/3 his house. Four persons namely, Dayanand Yadav (petitioner), Durgesh Upadhyay, Anup Pasawan and Sandip Yadav were apprehended at the spot. Thereafter during search of a room two persons with a bag found hiding beneath the bed. When they were caught, they disclosed their names as Sunil Poddar and Rajesh Poddar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after that the petitioner and others were also searched and it has also been submitted that from possession of this petitioner nothing except one mobile was recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that similarly situated coaccused Anoop Paswan has been granted bail by the learned Coordinate Bench vide Cr. Misc. No. 82849 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Learned counsel has lastly submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 03.08.2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with a condition that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83898 of 2025(2) dt.11-12-2025 3/3 the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present in the court whenever required. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Buxar Industrial P.S. Case No. 187 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T