Patna High CourtCWJC/19330/2018dfd for non appearance

Ramashish Prasad @ Ashish Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-11Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19330 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Ramashish Prasad @ Ashish Kumar, son of Late Saudi Mahto, resident of Village- Pachwara, P.S.- Nalanda, District- Nalanda.

2. Nitish Kumar, son of Awadh Kishore Prasad, resident of VillageManachak, P.S.- Sharmera, District- Nalanda.

3. Rahul Raj, son of Narendra Kumar, resident of Village- Surahi, P.S.- Islampur, District- Nalanda.

4. Dilip Chaudhary, son of Mahesh Chaudhary, resident of VillageBishunpur, P.S.- Ben, District- Nalanda.

5. Arun Pillai, son of Hari Pillai, resident of Village- Murshidabad, P.S. Brahmpur, District- Murshidabad (West Bengal). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar.

3. The Superintendent of Fire Service Station, Biharsharif, Nalanda.

4. The District Magistrate, Nalanda, Biharsharif.

5. The Superintendent of Police, Biharsharif, Nalanda.

6. The Sub Divisional Officer, Nalanda, Biharsharif.

7. The Labour Superintendent, Nalanda, Biharsharif.

8. The Chairman, Bid Settlement Committee, Nalanda, Biharsharif.

9. The Officer Incharge, Town Police Station, Biharsharif, Nalanda. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Raisul Haque, SC-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 11-10-2018 On the earlier occasion also, time was sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioners for seeking instructions from the petitioner as to whether any lis remains in the present case.

Today also nobody appears for the petitioners, hence, it appears that the petitioners have lost interest in the present case. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/Md. Rashid U