← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./593/2025bail granted

Shahid Azam v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-27Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.593 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2024 Thana- MOHAMMADPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Shahid Azam S/O Late Mainul Hoda R/O Village- Surwania, P.S.- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Javed Aslam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 75 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, while the informant was on the way along with his sister, two miscreants looted them on the point of pistol and fled away with mobile phone, a bag containing cash amounting to Rs. 7,000/- and other articles.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.593 of 2025(3) dt.27-03-2025 2/3 present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement made by co-accused, namely, Meraj Ansari and the same has got no evidentiary value. It is next submitted that no recovery of looted articles have been made from the possession of this petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 15.07.2024 and has got four criminal antecedents in which he is on bail in three cases. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that similarly situated co-accused has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 20.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 16044 of 2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.593 of 2025(3) dt.27-03-2025 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 75 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T