Kundan Keshri @ Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kr. Keshri v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64650 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-552 Year-2017 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== 1.

Kundan Keshri @ Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kr. Keshri Son of Kush Prasad Keshri, 2.

Kush Prasad Keshri, Son of Late Ghochu Sao.

3.

Vidya Devi, Wife of Kush Prasad Keshri, 4.

Ranjeet Keshri, 5.

Ranjan Keshri, Both Sons of Kush Prasad Keshri and All are resident of Mohlla- Nadraganj, P.S.- Civil Lines, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Poonam Keshri, Wife of Kundan Keshri, Resident of Mohalla- Nadraganj, P.S.- Civil Lines, District- Gaya, at present residing at Mohalla- Sati Asthan, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kuma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 14.12.2017 passed by learned SDJM, Masaurhi, in Complaint Case No.552 (C) of 2017 by which cognizance was taken against the petitioners under Section 323 and 498A of the I.P.C, Section 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. As per the report submitted by the learned S.D.J.M.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64650 of 2018(3) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 Masaurhi vide letter No.362 dated 08.06.2026, Complaint Case No.552 (C) of 2017 by which cognizance was taken against the petitioners under Section 323 and 498A of the I.P.C, Section 3\4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, has already been disposed of as the petitioners have already been acquitted vide judgment dated 18.04.2019.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already been acquitted and this case has become infructuous, accordingly, prays that the present case may be disposed of.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the report submitted by the concerned Court, the present Cr. Misc. Application stands disposed of having become infructuous.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Utkarsh.K/- U T