Niraj Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89276 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2024 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Niraj Singh S/O Ramesh Singh @ Ramesh Kumar Resident of Muradpur ward no 1 P.S.- Bangra, Dist.- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 180 of 2024 dated 07.09.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 309(4) of the B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, three unknown miscreants are alleged to have stopped the informant's motorcycle and looted the amount of Rs. 1,81,580/-, key of the bike, documents of the company, Oppo phone and Aadhar Card and fled away from the spot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89276 of 2024(2) dt.19-02-2025 2/2 the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Dhananjay Kumar. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Similar situated co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 05.02.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 86429 of 2024. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 10.09.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 180 of 2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Jyoti/- U T