Ayush Singh @ Sonu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.61204 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2018 Thana- BARHARA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Ayush Singh @ Sonu Kumar Singh Son of Satish Singh, Resident of VillageEkawana, P.S. Barhara, District-Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Smt. Renuka Ratnakar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Barhara P.S. Case No. 290 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 461 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant who is Incharge Principal of Macha Swami +2 School, in his written complaint has stated that 11 Computers, 3 Head of Hand Pump and two Batteries of the School has been stolen by unknown culprits.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. FIR is against unknown. It has been further submitted that the name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Rohit Kumar. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.61204 of 2018(3) dt.02-11-2018 2/2 has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 09.08.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-Bhojpur, in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No. 290 of 2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U