Bajrangi Prasad Yadav @ Vivek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79341 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-642 Year-2019 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== BAJRANGI PRASAD YADAV @ VIVEK KUMAR, Son of Sri Vinod Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village - Silhouri, P.S. - Marhowrah, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. When the petitioner was arrested on suspicion that he along with others was preparing to commit dacoity, from possession of the petitioner, a country made pistol and cartridge was recovered. Petitioner has stated on oath that he has got no criminal antecedent. Investigation of the case is already complete against the petitioner. There is no material to substantiate that the petitioner is not going to cooperate with the trial or is going to tamper with the evidence. Hence, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, after framing of the charges against the petitioner, on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79341 of 2019(2) dt.13-01-2020 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Marhowrah Police Station Case No. 642 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the court.

The trial court is directed to expedite the framing of charge against the petitioner even after separation of the trial of the petitioner, if needed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T