Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86690/2023allowed

Majhil Singh @ Ram Pratap Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-12Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86690 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2023 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== Majhil Singh @ Ram Pratap Singh S/O Late Ram Bahadur Singh VILLAGENAWADA, PS. RAGHUNATHPUR, DIST. SIWAN. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 411 and 414 of the IPC and Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, there has been recovery of one country-made pistol, five live cartridges and two mobile phones from the room of the petitioner.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. The name of the petitioner has come into light on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Vinay Kumar Singh. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged arms and cartridges, which were seized by the police whereas,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86690 of 2023(2) dt.12-01-2024 2/2 the as alleged mobile phones which were recovered belongs to the petitioner. Only on the basis of suspicion and due to his criminal antecedent, petitioner has implicated in the present case. He is languishing in judicial custody since 17.09.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail after framing of charge, if not framed. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.-1st Class, Siwan in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 220 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T