Randhir Singh @ Kari Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76630 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-227 Year-2019 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani ====================================================== Randhir Singh @ Kari Singh, Son of Rajendra Singh @ Rajo Singh, Resident of Village-Khangaon, P.S.-Pandaul, District-Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs.Namrata Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 06-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner in this case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No.227 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that illicit liquor has not been recovered from the house of this petitioner.

Learned APP for the State is present and has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein it is the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76630 of 2019(4) dt.06-03-2020 2/2 the illicit liquor has not been recovered from the house of this petitioner and this submission has not been contested by learned APP for the State, let the petitioner abovenamed in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (fifteen thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No.227 of 2019, corresponding to G.R. No.1808 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. i.e.

(i) a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) a condition that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.