Chandan Ravidas @ Chanchal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82905 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-405 Year-2025 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== Chandan Ravidas @ Chanchal Kumar S/o Babban Das @ Bavan Das, Resident of Village- Fatehpur, P.S.- Didarganj, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shyamal Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 04-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 405 of 2025 dated 27.06.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 109, 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and co-accused Bolbum Prasad came to the house of the informant and shot at her husband. Earlier, the co-accused had threatened the informant that he would shoot him.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The co-accused Bolbum Prasad and husband of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82905 of 2025(2) dt.04-12-2025 2/3 the informant are own brothers and there was dispute between them. It was the co-accused who shot at his brother and the petitioner was only a spectator and he had no idea that the coaccused would shoot his own brother. At the instance of the coaccused recovery of country made pistol along with used cartridge was made and the co-accused also confessed that he fired upon his brother. The petitioner was not arrested from the spot and nothing incriminating has been recovered from his person or possession. Learned counsel next submits that petitioner is having clean antecedent and chargesheet has been submitted. Learned counsel lastly submits that petitioner is in custody since 28.06.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the doubtful nature of allegation against the petitioner, his period of custody and submission of chargesheet, the petitioner, abovenamed, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Patna City / concerned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82905 of 2025(2) dt.04-12-2025 3/3 Court, in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 405 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. and other following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial Court.
(iii) In case of non-appearance of the petitioner on single date or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Shahnawaz/- U T