← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3586/2023disposed

Chandra Prakash Ajit @ Chandra Prakash Ajeet v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-20Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3586 of 2023 In Letters Patent Appeal No.657 of 2022 ====================================================== Chandra Prakash Ajit @ Chandra Prakash Ajeet, son of Sri Akshay Kumar Mishra, Resident of Village-Hariharpur Vidyalaya, P.O. and P.S. Teghra, District Begusarai, Bihar-851133.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, namely, Amir Subhani, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Jyoti Swaroop Srivastawa, the Learned Special Secretary, Law Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Patna High Court through the learned Registrar General namely Sri Manoj Kumar Sinha.

4.

Sri Manoj Kumar Sinha, the learned Registrar General, Patna High Court, Patna.

5.

Sri Rupesh Deo, the learned Convenor, Co-ordination Committee-cumDistrict and Sessions Judge, Patna, Judges Court Road, Civil Court, Patna, P.O.-Bankipur, District-Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ujjawal Bhushan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA- 7 Mr. Abhinav Ashok, AC to GA-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 20-03-2024 Learned counsels for the respective parties, on instruction, submitted that grievance of the petitioner has been redressed on 14.03.2024. Thereafter, the respondents are required to pass a formal order of issuance of appointment order and place of posting.

02. At this stage, learned counsel for the respondents

Patna High Court MJC No.3586 of 2023(6) dt.20-03-2024 2/2 pointed out that posting order is stated to have been notified. However, in the absence of order of appointment, issuance of place of posting order may not be appropriate. We hope the concerned respondents will issue order of appointment (if it is not already issued) within a period of one week from today.

03. Accordingly, the present petition stands dropped, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file interlocutory application for revival of this order, in the event of non-compliance of the order in its entirety.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Arun Kumar Jha, J) Balmukund/- Ashish/- U