Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86300/2024bail granted

Md. Imran @ Mohammad Imran v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-30Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86300 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-636 Year-2023 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Md. Imran @ Mohammad Imran S/O Nurul Haque @ Nurul Hoda Resident of village - Mahammadpur, Dharam Katesar, Police Station - Sakra, DistMuzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Thakur Brajesh Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kuchaikote P.S. Case no.636 of 2023 registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that on seeing police personnel the accused Teni Ram tried to mange to escape but he was apprehended at the spot. On search, a total of 241.92 liters of foreign made liquor is said to have been recovered from the seized Swift Dzire car bearing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86300 of 2024(5) dt.30-04-2025 2/3 Registration No. BR06CN8438.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case only for the reason that he happens to be the registered owner of the said vehicle. However, learned counsel for the petitioner further stated in paragraph no. 10 to the petition that one Rishi Raj borrowed his motorcycle from the petitioner requesting that he had to go to PGI for medical treatment of his mother and hence, the petitioner has no knowledge that his vehicle was put to some illegal use. No recovery has been made from physical or conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. In view of the aforesaid facts of the case, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Kuchaikote P.S. Case no.636 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86300 of 2024(5) dt.30-04-2025 3/3 learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-II, Gopalganj, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T