Shekhar Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82993 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-326 Year-2025 Thana- BAHADURGANJ District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Shekhar Kumar Sinha Son of Basant Kumar Sinha Resident of VillageTedhari, P.S.- Jiyapokhar, District- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-01-2026 Heard Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bahadurganj P.S. Case No. 326 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that unknown miscreants in an Ertiga car have intercepted him, assaulted him and taking away his Tata Intra with registration number WB-73G7015 loaded with vegetables. It is further alleged that the miscreants also took Rs. 600/- and a Redmi Note-11 mobile phone.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82993 of 2025(3) dt.27-01-2026 2/2 counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During the course of the investigation, the petitioner was apprehended as he is the owner of the said car. He also submits that the real fact is that there was a scuffle between the two vehicle owners, and as the informant has noted his vehicle number, has filed a false case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. No TIP has been conducted. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 21.07.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Bahadurganj P.S. Case No. 326 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T