Vikram Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83989 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Vikram Kumar Singh S/o- Arun Kunwar @ Arun Kumar Resident of VillageDharmdiha Ps- Phulparas District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anjani Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Muzaffarpur Cyber P.S. Case No. 79 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 3(5), 111(2), 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 337 of the B.N.S.,2023 and Sections 66B, C, D & E of the Information Technology Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that on secret information, the information reached the residential hotel, Aryan Residency, at room no. 305 and found that three boys were quarreling with each other for money. On interrogation they disclosed their names as petitioner and others. It is further alleged that co-accused Abhishek Pandey disclosed that they were staying here from 31st July and there is a bank account in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83989 of 2025(2) dt.12-12-2025 2/3 Axis Bank in the name of NGO Ram Pyari Nand Lal Sewa Sansthan and a bank account by way of cyber fraud. Rs. 8,33,00,000/- (eight crore thirty-three lakhs) has been received, and there is a dispute between Vikram Kumar and him for the commission of money received in the account. Mahavir Kumar @ Sonu and Guddu Kumar used to prepare Aadhar cards by committing fraud, and they used to help him in cyber fraud. On search, passbooks, mobiles, PAN cards, Aadhar cards, debit cards, rubber stamps, etc. have been recovered.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the seizure list, it is clear that from the possession of this petitioner only one mobile was recovered. All the documents of the NGO were recovered from the possession of the co-accused, namely, Abhishek Pandey. It is only the statement of the co-accused that they were having a dispute over the commission of the frauded amount. No incriminating material has been recovered from this petitioner. He further submits that the police were informed at 112 by one of the relatives of the petitioner. Moreover, a statement has been made
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83989 of 2025(2) dt.12-12-2025 3/3 in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 07.08.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur East in connection with Muzaffarpur Cyber P.S. Case No. 79 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T