Kamaldev Singh @ Kamaldev Bhardwaj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23520 of 2019 ====================================================== Kamaldev Singh @ Kamaldev Bhardwaj Son of Sri Deo Prasad resident of Village- Machhariyawan, Police Station- Fatwah, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Land Reforms and Revenue, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2.
Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.
3.
District Magistrate-cum- Collector, Patna.
4.
Deputy Collector of Land Reforms, Patna City, Patna. 5.
Circle Officer, Daniyawan Circle, Police Station- Fatwah, District- Patna. 6.
Allahabad Bank through its General Manager, Head Office, 2 Netaji Subhas Road, Kolkata- 700001.
7.
Regional Manager, Allahabad Bank, Regional Office, Near Kotwali, Police Station, Patna.
8.
Branch Manager, Allahabad Bank, Machhariyawan Branch, Machhariyawan, Patna.
9.
Hare Ram Hare Krishna Son of Late Tulsi Narayan Singh resident of Village- Machhariyawan, Police Station- Fatwah, District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raj Shekhar, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Prakritita Sharma, A.C. to SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to exercise their power conferred on them under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956, by removing the encroachment caused by the private respondent No. 9 over a piece of land, which is a Public land situate at Mauza Bakipur, Machchariyawan, Mahal-Bakipur Machchariyawan, in the
Patna High Court CWJC No.23520 of 2019(2) dt.14-01-2020 2/2 District of Patna, bearing Tauzi No. 15, Thana No. 27, Khata No. 136, Khesra No. 1519, admeasuring 7 decimals and Khata No. 137, Khesra No. 1512 admeasuring 45 decimals. It does not appear from the pleadings that the petitioner ever approached any authority raising the grievance as raised in the present writ application.
This application, therefore, cannot be maintained. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of with an observation that the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach appropriate forum in accordance with law.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) S.Ali/- U