Ful Mohammad Mansoori @ Bhulan Mansoori @ Fulmahammad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1064 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2023 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan ====================================================== FUL MOHAMMAD MANSOORI @ BHULAN MANSOORI @ FULMAHAMMAD SON OF LATE NOOR MAHAMMAD MANSOORI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DUMARHAR BUZURG, P.S. - DARAULI, DISTRICT - SIWAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Kant, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Darauli P.S. Case No. 198 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, all the FIR named accused persons including the petitioner are said to have assaulted the informant's side brutally with deadly weapons due to which they sustained injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and he has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1064 of 2024(3) dt.07-03-2024 2/2 been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. There is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is serious allegation against the petitioner to assault one Jainuddin Mansoori (brother-in-law of the informant) with deadly weapons due to which he sustained grievous injury, which is also evident from the injury report enclosed in the case diary. Hence, petitioner does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of the injury of injured Jainuddin Mansoori i.e. grievous, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T