Md. Aman v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87411 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-334 Year-2024 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Md. Aman Son of Md. Imtiyaz @ Ghoti @ Md. Imteyaj Resident of MohallaPolice Line, Khagaria Tola, P.S.- Rampur, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Rampur P.S. Case No. 334 of 2024, dated 14.07.2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 109, 324(4), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per allegation, the petitioner along with other co-accused came to the house of the informant and assaulted him by lathi, danda and iron rod.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as a matter of fact, the petitioner is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87411 of 2025(4) dt.06-04-2026 2/3 a next door neighbor of the informant and there is a dispute regarding parking space before their house and hence, this false case has been filed. He further submits that as per the injury report, injury caused to the informant/victim is simple in nature. He further submits that allegation against the accused persons are general and omnibus and there is no specific allegation against the petitioner.
5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.
6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.
8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, in connection
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87411 of 2025(4) dt.06-04-2026 3/3 with Rampur P.S. Case No. 334 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S 2023, and on the following conditions:
(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.
(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) shoaib/- U T