Raju Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.66146 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gaya ====================================================== Raju Singh S/o Late Ramjanam Singh @ Late Ramjanm Singh Resident of Village-Baranda,P.S. Dhibara,Distt.-Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kiran Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwary 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Excise (Sherghati) Case No. 311 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of 280 litres of country made liquor from Alto Car.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 30.08.2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66146 of 2018(3) dt.22-11-2018 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Gaya, in connection with Excise (Sherghati) Case No. 311 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T