Kapoor Gond @ Kapoor Kumar Gond v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83349 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2025 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Kapoor Gond @ Kapoor Kumar Gond S/O Paramhans Gond R/O Vill.- Lala Ke Belwa, P.S.- Jijaipur, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Kanti Devi @ Kumari Chandra Kala Daughter of Baburam Gond, W/O Kapor Gond @ Kapoor Resident of Village-kumar Gond Barhara, Post Office- Jigna Dubey, Police Station- Bhore, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Umanath Mishra, A.P.P.

For the O.P.-2 :

None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Despite filing Vakalatnama, nobody appears on behalf of opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioner, husband of the opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115, 85, 303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. Allegation against petitioner is of matrimonial cruelty and demand for dowry.

4. While denying the allegations made in the F.I.R., learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely because he happens to be husband of opposite party no. 2. At no point of time,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83349 of 2025(5) dt.08-07-2026 2/2 petitioner demanded any dowry or committed torture with opposite party no. 2 and is still ready to keep the opposite party no. 2 with full honour and dignity, but opposite party no. 2 does not want to live with petitioner. Moreover, the case is triable by the learned Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let this petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. - VI, Gopalganj in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No. 153 of 2025, subject to the conditions, as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T