Bihari Rawani @ Bihari Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84232 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2014 Thana- BANDEYA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Bihari Rawani @ Bihari Singh S/o Late Shankar Rawani R/o Village - Jujharpur (Judharpur), P.S - Goh, District - Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bandeya P.S. Case No. 38 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 435, 427, 385, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that on 10.09.2014 at 09:30 PM, 20-25 members of banned Naxal Organization came at the work site of the informant Ravi Shankar Singh and set fire to his backhoe loader and Highwa, also snatched three mobile phones of the workers.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84232 of 2025(2) dt.15-12-2025 2/2 counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants and the name of this petitioner has surfaced during the course of investigation on the information given by spy. He has also submitted that the petitioner has been framed in this case due to his criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that the petitioner is not a member of any banned group. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.07.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of six cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad, Bihar in connection with Bandeya P.S. Case No. 38 of 2014. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T