Pramod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.993 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.
Pramod Yadav Son of Late Rameshwar Yadav, Resident of VillageSonhathu, Post Office - Sonhathu, Police Station - Haspura, DistrictAurangabad. 2.
Pancham Yadav, Son of Late Ram Krit Yadav, Resident of VillageSonhathu, Post Office - Sonhathu, Police Station - Haspura, DistrictAurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary Land and Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Collector, Aurangabad.
3.
The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Aurangabad. 4.
The Circle Officer, Haspura.
5.
Kanti Kuer, Wife of Late Jai Kumar Ram, Resident of Village - Sonhathu, Post Office- Sonhathu, Police Station - Haspura, District - Aurangabad. 6.
Hevanti Devi, Wife of Jeetan Ram, Resident of Village - Sonhathu, Post Office- Sonhathu, Police Station - Haspura, District - Aurangabad. 7.
Renu Devi, Wife of Mitan Ram, Resident of Village - Sonhathu, Post OfficeSonhathu, Police Station - Haspura, District - Aurangabad. 8.
Kavita Devi, Wife of Om Prakash Ram, Resident of Village - Sonhathu, Post Office- Sonhathu, Police Station - Haspura, District - Aurangabad. 9.
Richa Devi, Wife of Shambhu Ram, Resident of Village - Sonhathu, Post Office- Sonhathu, Police Station - Haspura, District - Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Uday Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Government Advocate (2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-03-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AC to GA-2.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing vehemently for some time realizing his difficulty, seeks permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to seek
Patna High Court CWJC No.993 of 2025(2) dt.18-03-2025 2/2 his remedy in accordance with law before an authority competent/forum.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U