Jagarnath Ray @ Jagannath Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89234 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2024 Thana- TISIAUTA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Jagarnath Ray @ Jagannath Ray Son of Late Lakhan Rai Resident of Village- Pindauta khurd, P.S.- Tisiauta, Distt.- Vaishali 2.

Rajeev Kumar @ Rajeev Ray Son of Jagarnath Prasad @ Jagarnath Ray @ Jagannath Ray Resident of Village- Pindauta khurd, P.S.- Tisiauta, Distt.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-02-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 2, during pendency of the anticipatory bail application was arrested, and thus seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no. 2, Rajeev Kumar @ Rajeev Ray.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with respect to petitioner no. 2 only.

5. The petitioner no. 1 apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89234 of 2024(2) dt.07-02-2025 2/2 Code.

6. It is next submitted that petitioner no. 1 is a person with clean antecedent and is aged about 71 years and from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that general and omnibus allegation has been alleged against him. It is also submitted that the person who has remained a person with clean antecedent for 71 years, all of a sudden has been made an accused based on general and omnibus allegation.

7. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

8. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner no. 1, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Tisaiauta P.S. Case No. 59 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T