Sanjay Ram @ Sanjit Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.67101 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2018 Thana- JADIA District- Supaul ====================================================== Sanjay Ram @ Sanjit Ram, Son of Mahendra Ram, Resident of VillageRajgaon, Ward No.2 P.S.-Jadiya, District-Supaul, ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bhim Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jadiya P.S.Case No.104 of 2018 dated 18.6.2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379, 307, 504, 506 the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of firing on the informant but it did not hit anybody. Further allegation is of snatching of Mangalsutra.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the FIR itself shows that no injury has been received by the informant. He is in custody for about four months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67101 of 2018(2) dt.27-11-2018 2/2 and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-5th, Supaul in connection with Jadiya P.S.Case No.104 of 2018.. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T