← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/3117/2018dismissed

Ashok Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar Through Home Secretary Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And ORS

2019-01-11Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3117 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2017 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna ====================================================== Ashok Kumar Sharma, son of Sri Kamta Prasad Sharma, Resident of Rajapur, P.S. Bodhgaya, Distt.-Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

3. Superintendent of Police, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Patna

4. Officer-in-Charge, Bikram Police Station, Bikram

5. District Agriculture Officer, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar, Advocate Mr. Bibhuti Narayan, Advocate For the Respondent-State:

Md. Shailesh Kumar, AC to GP-5 for the Respondent-Vigilance:

Mr. Ajay Mishra, AC to L.O. I/c Vigilance ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 11-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Vigilance.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the First Information Report (for short 'FIR') of Bikram P.S. Case No.81 of 2017 registered under Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(c) and (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sections 467, 468, 419, 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the allegations made in the FIR are malicious in nature. For the selfsame charges, a departmental proceeding was also initiated against the petitioner, but no evidence could be collected in support of the

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.3117 of 2018 dt.11-01-2019 2/3 charges. However, the departmental proceeding has been kept pending awaiting the final outcome of the investigation of the instant FIR. She submitted that the entire amount withdrawn by the petitioner was distributed or spent amongst the beneficiaries and the allegation that after withdrawal of the amount, the same was not spent is totally false.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the Vigilance submitted that the allegations made in the FIR do attract ingredients of the cognizable offence punishable under the penal code as also under the various provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act. He submitted that since the allegations made in the FIR disclosed ingredients of cognizable offence, no illegality can be found in the action of the police whereby an FIR has been instituted against the petitioner.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the FIR as contained in Annexure-1 to the present application.

6. The allegation made in the FIR is that the petitioner being the Block Agriculture Officer has defalcated Rs.52,50,000/- of Shri Vidhi Yojna of the year 2013-14 by not making payment of subsidy and distribution of fertilizers and pesticides amongst the

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.3117 of 2018 dt.11-01-2019 3/3 farmers. The FIR was instituted pursuant to preliminary inquiry conducted by the Agriculture Department.

7. The allegations made in the FIR do attract the ingredients of the offences alleged. The offences are cognizable in nature.

8. To hold investigation into a cognizable offence is the statutory right of the police. At this stage, the Court has no role to play. The role of the Court starts only after the investigation is over and a report under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is submitted in the court. At that stage, the concerned court could apply its mind as to whether there is prima facie material to summon the accused or not.

9. Since there is no illegality either in institution of the FIR or in investigation of the case, the prayer made by the petitioner cannot be allowed. However, the investigating agency is expected to complete the investigation within a reasonable time.

10. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 16.01.2019 Transmission Date 16.01.2019