Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83363 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-817 Year-2025 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Sonu Kumar Son of Kedar Rai Resident Of Mohalla- Rambhadra, PsHajipur Town, Dist- Vaishali 2.

Md. Sabbir Son of Bhonu Kuraishi Resident Of Mohalla- Vavli Pandriwa, Ps- Hajipur Town, Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shivjee Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 817/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of B.N.S. and subsequently Section 317(2) of B.N.S. was added.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 02.07.2025, Sanjay Kumar, working as Manager at Bharat Finance Inclusion Limited in Saran district, left his office at 7:00 AM to visit centers in Hajipur. He collected Rs. 49,147/- at Andarkila center and Rs. 17,750/- at Ramchaura Mandir center, keeping the money in his motorcycle dickey. Near Ramchaura temple, four

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83363 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/2 boys stopped him; one pointed a pistol, robbed his red Pulsar 125 motorcycle containing Rs. 66,857/-, charger, TAB, and biometric card.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in the case. No incriminating articles has been recovered from their possession. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner no. 1 has four criminal antecedents and petitioner no. 2 has three criminal antecedents and they are in custody since 13.07.2025 and 02.08.2025. The petitioners undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners on the ground that the name of the petitioners have come during investigation.

6. Considering the gravity of the offence and their criminal antecedents, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T