Managing Committee Masjid Islamia Sargatia, v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4064 of 2018 In Letters Patent Appeal No.71 of 2017 ====================================================== Managing Committee Masjid Islamia Sargatia, through its Mutawalli, Md. Ilmuddin Ansari, Son of Late Sahebjan Ansari, Resident of Village- Sargatia, P.S. Gopalpur, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chairman, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Patna.

2.

Dr. Khurshid Alam, S/o not known, The Special Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3.

Dr. Khursheed Alam, the Chairman Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Vidyapati Marg, Patna.

4.

Md. Zahid Hussain, the Secretary, Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Vidyapati Marg, Bihar, Patna.

5.

Lokesh Ramchandra Dewrew, the District Magistrate, District- West Champaran, Bettiah.

6.

Harindra Jha, the District Education Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah. 7.

Madrasa Khairul Uloom, Sargatia, through its Secretary, Kalam Ansari, S/o Bulai Ansari, Resident of Village- Sargatia, P.S.- Gopalpur, District- West Champaran.

8.

Islam Ansari, Son of Late Bulai Ansari, resident of Village- Sargatia, P.S.- Gopalpur, District- West Champaran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the State :

Dr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG-15 For the Madarsa Board :

Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, Advocate For O.P. No. 7 :

Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Advoate Ms. Vagisha Pragya, Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 03-07-2019 An affidavit has been filed today bringing on record the order dated 24th April, 2019.

Patna High Court MJC No.4064 of 2018(4) dt.03-07-2019 2/2 In our considered opinion, keeping in view the facts brought on record, we do not propose to further allow the applicant to pursue this contempt application without prejudice to the rights of either of the parties to question the correctness of the order dated 24th April, 2019 before the appropriate forum. The application is consigned to records.

(Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) P.K.P./- U