Seraj Ansari @ Saroj Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83725 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2025 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Buxar ====================================================== Seraj Ansari @ Saroj Ansari S/o- Tasauwar Ansari R/v- Sareya Ujiyar Ghat Ps- Krantadih Dist- Ballia U.P ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Phuljahan Begum W/o- Shahjad Ansari, D/o- Azadi Ansari R/v- Khalasai Muhalla Ps- Buxar T Dist-Buxar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dr.Kamal Deo Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Buxar Mahila P.S. Case No. 39/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 85 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have tortured the informant mentally and physically due to non-fulfillment of demand of Rs. 70,000/- as dowry when she was pregnant and later on she lost her child due to said assault.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83725 of 2025(2) dt.01-12-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner who is brother-in-law of the informant. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the informant. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. As per the impugned order, the petitioner is in custody since 18.09.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Buxar in connection with Buxar Mahila P.S. Case No. 39/2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T