← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./80543/2019bail granted

Shivam Kumar @ Bhola v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-09Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80543 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2019 Thana- MAJORGANJ District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== SHIVAM KUMAR @ BHOLA, aged about 27 years, Son of Satya Narayan Ray, Resident of Village - Sujua, Ward No. 4 Bahera, P.S.- Majorganj, Distt.- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Devendra Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Raj Kishore Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 272, 273, 414 of the IPC and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 252 liters wine is said to have been recovered.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is alleged that total 252 liters wine is recovered from joint house of co-accused Ram Ishwar Sahani where other family members also reside. The name of the petitioner has come on the basis of disclosure made by co-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80543 of 2019(2) dt.09-12-2019 2/2 accused Ram Ishwar Sahani as per F.I.R. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.-IIcum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi, in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 98 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T