Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77216/2019bail granted

Satish Kumar @ Satish Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-18Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77216 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2019 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== Satish Kumar @ Satish Kumar Singh Son of Raghunandan Singh Resident of Village- Babu Balkhora, P.S.- Amas, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 18-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 25.09.2019 in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 183 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 354 (A), (B) of the Indian Penal Code and 8 of POCSO Act.

The statement of victim has been recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. in which she claimed that petitioner not only caught her hand but also dragged her with mala fide intention.

Submission on behalf of the petitioner is that the present case has been lodged on account of previous enmity and as a matter of fact, father of the petitioner being Ward

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77216 of 2019(2) dt.18-12-2019 2/2 Commissioner had imposed penalty on the uncle of the informant and that is why the informant has brought this false case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (POCSO Act), Gaya in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 183 of 2019, POCSO Case No. 107 of 2019.

However, it is made clear that if any complaint of similar nature is made on behalf of the informant or others against the petitioner, then in that circumstance, the concerned court may cancel the bail bond of the petitioner after due and proper enquiry.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) shahzad/- U T