← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./83654/2025allowed

Vijendra Prasad @ Bijendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-06Mr. Justice Harish Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83654 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== Vijendra Prasad @ Bijendra Prasad, Son of Kripa Shankar Prasad, Resident of Village -Jayee, Chapra (Matiar), P S -Manjhi District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-01-2026 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No.90 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 118(2), 126(2), 351(2), 351(3), 76 and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is of causing repeated knife blows over the informant, besides the allegation of abusing him in an inebriated condition along with other accused persons. It is also alleged that earlier also the petitioner had committed such incidents with the mother of the informant.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner, taking this Court through the FIR, contended that besides the fact that there is a counter version of the present case being Manjhi P.S. Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83654 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 2/3 No.92 of 2025 instituted by the wife of the brother of the petitioner, the parties are agnates and bickering over a land dispute, which resulted into free fight and some unfortunate injuries. Moreover, the entire case falls to the ground for the simple reason that the informant and his brother have sustained simple injuries. However, one of the injuries is said to be a penetrating wound. The petitioner is a man of fair antecedent and he will fully cooperate in the proceedings of the Court.

5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State submitted that there is a specific accusation against the petitioner of causing repeated knife blows to the informant.

6. Having considered the submissions set forth by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the genesis of the occurrence, coupled with the factum of case and counter case, besides the simple nature of injuries and the fair antecedent of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XI, Saran at Chapra in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No.90 of 2025,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83654 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 3/3 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U T