Sashi Ranjan Morya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88136 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2024 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar ====================================================== Sashi Ranjan Morya Son of Dinesh Singh village- Kailakh, Ps- Dhansoyee, Dist- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Buxar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 283 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 103(1), 331(3), 309(6), 3(5) of the BNS.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that two unknown miscreants committed the murder of the informant's mother using sharp weapon.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of self-confessional statement before the police, which has no evidentiary value in the eye of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88136 of 2024(3) dt.24-03-2025 2/2 law. Except confessional statement of this petitioner before the police, there is no material against the petitioner to show his involvement in the alleged occurrence. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2024 and has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Learned APP further submitted that petitioner has himself confessed his guilt. Learned APP further submitted that post mortem report also corroborates the case of the prosecution.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being ample material against the petitioner to show his involvement in the alleged occurrence as also nature and gravity of offence this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T