Sanjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5628 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-750 Year-2023 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Sanjeet Kumar SON OF BIJENDRA PRASAD RAI @ BIRENDRA RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - RAHAR DIYAR, PS- SONEPUR, DISTTSARAN AT CHAPRA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jeetendra Narayan For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr.Dilip Kumar No.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 16-04-2024 Heard Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, the petitioner, who is the husband of the informant's daughter is said to have killed the daughter of the informant by setting her on fire.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation lev-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5628 of 2024(3) dt.16-04-2024 2/3 elled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased and there is no specific overt act against him. The marriage of the informant's daughter was solemnized with the petitioner and out of the wedlock they have a six years old daughter. He further submits that the deceased got burnt at her parental house while she was cooking meal. On the same day, the parental family members of the deceased informed the petitioner about the incident. He further submits that the before death of the informant's daughter, she was admitted to different hospitals for better treatment and whole expense of the treatment was borne by the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as there is no specific overt act against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5628 of 2024(3) dt.16-04-2024 3/3 with Sonepur P.S. Case No.750 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T