Pawan Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.536 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2023 Thana- RAUTA District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Pawan Choudhary Son Of Bachcha Lal Choudhary @ Bachchulal Resident Of Village - Dumariya, P.S. - Rauta, District - Purnea 2.

Kalash Choudhary Son Of Bachcha Lal Choudhary @ Bachchulal Resident Of Village - Dumariya, P.S. - Rauta, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioners along with others is of killing the brother of the informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. They have committed no offence. He submitted that the petitioners are the brother-in-law of the deceased. On the basis of suspicion, petitioners have been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.536 of 2024(2) dt.16-01-2024 2/2 implicated in this case rather there is no specific allegation against these petitioners. He further submitted that the other coaccused has already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 08.09.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 60067 of 2023. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. They are languishing in judicial custody since 26.09.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Purnea in connection with Rauta P.S. Case No. 21 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T