Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85105/2025bail granted

Parwati Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-06Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85105 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2025 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria ====================================================== Parwati Devi W/o Patel Singh Resident of Village - Sonvarsha, P.S - Chautham, District - Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the dispute is civil in nature to which a criminal colour has been given. It is next submitted that the informant is claiming that the land in dispute belongs to him while Hemraj claimed that he purchased the land from Nawal Sah in the Year 1997 and in pursuance whereof, Jamabandi in the name of Hemraj was created. Further, Ram Swaroop Singh is purchaser

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85105 of 2025(2) dt.06-02-2026 2/3 of the land in dispute from Hemraj. It is further submitted that as far as Bipin Singh is concerned, against him it is alleged that he looted the wheat crop of the informant from the land in dispute. It is also alleged that earlier Patel Singh had also looted his wheat crop.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant being wife of Patel Singh. It is also submitted that allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove her innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Chautham P. S. Case No.100 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85105 of 2025(2) dt.06-02-2026 3/3 Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T