Bhankul Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.634 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2025 Thana- SAMSTIPUR RPF/POST DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== 1.

BHANKUL SAH Son of Late Vinod Sah @ Vinod Kumar Sah R/o Belari Sonar Tola, P.O. and P.S.- Ujiarpur, District - Samastipur, State - Bihar. 2.

Ramesh Kumar Son of Abodh Sah R/o Bagdob, P.O. and P.S.- Begusarai, District - Begusarai, State - Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhigyan Kumar, Advocate Mr.Amit Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rail R.P.F/Samastipur P.S. Case no.8 of 2025 registered under section 3 of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.

3. As per the prosecution case, on being asked by the police personnel to stop, it is stated that the three accused persons including the two petitioners herein made an attempt to escape. The petitioners were caught and from their possession 15 meters of aluminium cable and pendrol clip was recovered. On enquiry, it is stated that they disclosed that they commit theft of these articles and sell it to kabadiwala.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.634 of 2026(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from their possession and they have no criminal antecedent. They are in custody since 1.9.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. They undertake to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation against the petitioners in the FIR, the petitioners being in custody since 1.9.2025, charge-sheet having been submitted in the case and especially the petitioners not having any criminal antecedent, both the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Rail R.P.F/ Samastipur P.S. Case no.8 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Railway, District-Samastipur.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T